Prueba Xpert® MTB/RIF para el diagnóstico de Tuberculosis en el Instituto Médico La Floresta

La necesidad de un diagnóstico rápido, sensible y específico para tuberculosis es apremiante; se estiman 4 000 muertes cada día y aproximadamente 28 000 personas se contagian de esta enfermedad. La prueba Xpert®MTB/RIF consiste en un ensayo de diagnóstico in vitro de reacción en cadena de la polimerasa (PCR) en tiempo real automatizada, semicuantitativa, que en tan solo dos horas, permite detectar el ácido desoxirribonucleico (ADN) del complejo Mycobacterium tuberculosis (MTB) y mutaciones asociadas a la resistencia a rifampicina. Objetivo: Describir la experiencia del ensayo Xpert®MTB/ RIF y su valor diagnóstico en Dpto. de Microbiología del Instituto Médico La Floresta, desde abril 2012 hasta abril 2021. Métodos: Estudio descriptivo de muestras respiratorias y de otras procedencias, de pacientes con sospecha de tuberculosis, ensayadas por PCR a través del Xpert®MTB/RIF. Adicionalmente se realizó Ziehl-Neelsen y cultivo por el método de Ogawa Kudoh modificado, dependiendo del volumen de muestra recibida. Resultados: De 618 PCR realizadas, 58 muestras fueron positivas (9,4 %), 56 correspondieron a adultos y 2 a niños, 81 % se clasificaron como tuberculosis pulmonar y 19 % como extrapulmonar. A 37 se les realizó cultivo, de las cuales 10 no desarrollaron crecimiento, y a 33 adicionalmente Ziehl-Neelsen, de las cuales 12 presentaron baciloscopias negativas. En cinco de las muestras se detectó resistencia a rifampicina. Conclusiones: A través de la prueba Xpert®MTB/RIF fue posible detectar MTB en aquellas con baciloscopias negativas, en las que no desarrollaron crecimiento en el cultivo y permitió la rápida instauración de tratamiento en la tuberculosis multirresistente.

The rapid, sensitive, and specific diagnosis for tuberculosis is urgent; 4 000 deaths are estimated every day and approximately 28 000 people are infected with this disease. The Xpert®MTB/RIF test consists of an automated, semi-quantitative real-time polymerase chain reaction (PCR) in vitro diagnostic assay that, in just two hours, allows the detection of Mycobacterium tuberculosis complex (MTB) DNA and mutations associated with resistance to rifampicin. Objective: To describe the experience of the Xpert®MTB/RIF assay and its diagnostic value in the Department of Microbiology of the La Floresta Medical Institute, from April 2012 to April 2021. Methods: Descriptive study of respiratory samples and other sources, from patients with suspected of tuberculosis, assayed by PCR through Xpert®MTB/RIF. Additionally, Ziehl-Neelsen and culture were performed by the modified Ogawa Kudoh method, depending on the volume of sample received. Results: Of 618 PCR performed, 58 samples were positive (9.4 %), 56 corresponded to adults and 2 to children, 81 % were classified as pulmonary tuberculosis and 19 % as extrapulmonary. Culture was performed on 37, of which 10 did not develop growth, and on 33 additionally Ziehl-Neelsen, of which 12 presented negative bacilloscopy. Rifampicin resistance was detected in five of the samples. Conclusions: Through the Xpert®MTB/RIF test, it was possible to detect MTB in those with negative bacilloscopy, in which they did not develop growth in the culture and allowed the rapid establishment of treatment in multidrug-resistant tuberculosis.

Contribución del uso de XPERT MTB/RIF y su costo-efectividad en el diagnóstico de tuberculosis pulmonar y la resistencia a rifampicina: una comparación con métodos diagnósticos no moleculares / Contribution of the use of xpert MTB/RIF and its cost-effectiveness in the diagnosis of pulmonary tuberculosis and resistance to rifampicin: a comparison with non molecular diagnostic methods

Resumen Introducción: La tuberculosis es un problema de salud pública; su control requiere diagnóstico temprano y tratamiento oportuno. Xpert MTB/RIF® es una tecno logía diagnóstica basada en PCR en tiempo real, detecta el Complejo Mycobacterium tuberculosis y la susceptibilidad a rifampicina. Objetivo: Determinar la contribución del Xpert MTB/RIF y su costo-efectividad en la detección de tuberculosis y la resistencia a rifampicina en muestras respirato rias al compararlo con métodos de diagnóstico no moleculares Materiales y Métodos: Se analizaron 1.574 muestras de pacientes con sospecha de tuberculosis pulmonar que fueron procesadas para microscopía con coloración fluorescente de auramina-rodamina, Xpert MTB/RIF y cultivo en BACTEC MGIT 960. Los resultados obtenidos se compararon entre los métodos no moleculares y los moleculares para la detección de M. tuberculosis y susceptibilidad a rifampicina y se realizó un análisis comparativo de costos y costo efectividad. Resultados: 19,2% de las muestras fueron positivas por alguna de las técnicas usadas. Xpert MTB/RIF detectó M. tuberculosis en 90,4% del total de muestras positivas con un índice Kappa de 0,77 (IC95%: 0,74-0,82) comparado con el cultivo. La resistencia a rifampicina por Xpert fue 8,1%, sensibilidad 94,1% (IC95%: 73,0-99,0%), especificidad 98,4% (IC95%: 95,5-99,5%) y Kappa de 0,88 (IC95%: 0,76-1,00). La razón incremental de costo efectividad (RICE) fue menor en Xpert MTB/RIF comparada con el cultivo. Conclusión: Xpert MTB/RIF es una prueba eficiente y costo efectiva en la detección de casos de M. tuberculosis en muestras pulmonares comparado con los mé todos de diagnóstico basados en cultivo, sin embargo y a diferencia del Xpert MTB/RIF, estos pueden aportar en el diagnóstico con el aislamiento de especies de micobacterias no tuberculosas y la susceptibilidad a isoniazida y otros medicamentos.

Abstract Introduction: Tuberculosis is a public health problem its control requires early diagnosis and timely treatment. Xpert MTB/RIF is a real-time PCR based diagnostic technology, detects the Mycobacterium tuberculosis complex and rifampicin resistance. Objective: To determine the contribution of Xpert MTB/RIF and its cost-effectiveness in the detection of potential positive cases for tuberculosis and resistance to rifampicin in respiratory samples comparatively with diagnostic non molecular methods Materials and Methods: From 2013 to 2015, 1.574 clinical samples of patients with suspected pulmonary tuberculosis were evaluated by smear microscopy using auramina-rodamina stain, Xpert and culture in liquid medium BACTEC MGIT 960®. Results: 19,2% of the samples were positive for any of the methods used, Xpert detected M. tuberculosis in 90,4% of the positive samples and the concordance between Xpert and cultures had a Kappa index of 0,71 (IC95%: 0,62-0,72). Xpert identified resistance to rifampicin in 8,1% of the clinical samples studied with a sensitivity 94.1% (IC95%: 73,0-99,0%), specificity 98,4% (IC95%: 95,5-99,5%) and Kappa index 0,88 (IC95%: 0,76-1,00). Xpert had an incremental cost effectiveness ratio lower than culture (RICE). Conclusion: Xpert MTB/Rif is efficient diagnostic technique and comparable with culture in cost effectiveness for pulmonary tuberculosis diagnosis. However, culture based methods, in contrast to Xpert, may allow the isolation and identification of non tuberculosis mycobacterial species and the possibility to perform susceptibility for other antituberculous drugs.

Caracterización clínica y microbiológica de pacientes con trazas en Xpert MTB/RIF Ultra / Clinical and microbiological characterization of patients with Xpert MTB/RIF Ultra traces

INTRODUCCIÓN: El Xpert MTB/RIF Ultra (Ultra) ha mejorado dramáticamente el diagnóstico de la tuberculosis (TBC). Con él ha nacido la categoría de trazas, que es la menor carga bacilar detectable por este examen. OBJETIVO: Describir las características clínicas de los pacientes con presencia de trazas en el Ultra y evaluar la confirmación de la TBC como diagnóstico clínico. MATERIALES Y MÉTODOS: Estudio descriptivo de serie de casos. Se extrajo la información de fichas clínicas de pacientes con positividad a trazas. Se confrontaron datos clínicos, microbiológicos e histopatológicos. RESULTADOS: Se analizaron 21 pacientes. La edad promedio fue de 52 años. Todos los casos presentaron baciloscopias negativas. Cuatro cultivos en medio líquido MGIT fueron positivos, dos en pleura parietal, uno en líquido pleural y otro en expectoración. En pleura parietal, tres casos presentaron granulomas con necrosis caseosa y un granuloma esbozos de necrosis. En tejido pulmonar se observaron dos casos con granulomas con esbozos de necrosis y dos con granulomas no necrotizantes. Tres pacientes tenían el antecedente de TBC previa, se interpretó la positividad de trazas en ellos como falsos positivos. Finalmente se diagnosticaron 13 casos como TBC activa, donde cinco de ellos fueron TBC pleurales. La mayor concordancia clínica, microbiológica e histopatológica fue en muestras de líquido y tejido pleural. DISCUSIÓN: Se debe interpretar con cautela los hallazgos de esta prueba en muestras de vía aérea; el análisis multidisciplinario (clínica, imágenes, microbiología, histología) es crucial en las decisiones de nuestras conductas clínicas futuras. El hallazgo de trazas en pleura tiene, a nuestro parecer, un alto valor diagnóstico en el estudio de la tuberculosis en esta localización.

INTRODUCTION: Xpert MTB/RIF Ultra has dramatically changed the diagnosis of tuberculosis. A new category called traces appeared, which is the smallest amount of bacillar load detectable. OBJECTIVE: Describe the clinical characteristics of patients that present traces in Xpert MTB/RIF Ultra test, and to evaluate the confirmation of tuberculosis as clinical diagnosis. METHODS: We perform a descriptive case series study. Information was recovered from clinical records of patients with positive test for traces. Clinical, histopathological and microbiological results were confronted. RESULTS: Twenty one patients were analyzed. The mean age was 52 years-old. All cases had negative smear microscopy and four MGIT cultures were positive, two in pleural fluid and another in sputum. In parietal pleura, three cases presented granulomas with caseous necrosis, and one showed granuloma with very little necrosis. In pleural tissue we observed two cases of granulomas with traces of necrosis and two with non-necrotizing granulomas. Three patients had history of previous tuberculosis and positive traces, the test was interpreted as a false positive result. Finally, active tuberculosis was diagnosed in 13 cases, and five of them were pleural tuberculosis. The highest clinical, microbiological and histopathological agreement was in fluid and pleural tissue samples. DISCUSSION: The findings of Xpert MTB/RIF Ultra in airway samples must be interpreted carefully. Multi-disciplinary analysis is crucial in future clinical decisions. The finding of traces in pleura has, in our opinion, a high diagnostic value in the study of tuberculosis in this location.

Apport du test expert MTBRIF dans le diagnostic de la tuberculose toute forme à Saint-Louis / contribution of the Xpert MTB / Rif test in the diagnosis of tuberculosis of any form in Saint-Louis

Introduction: le test Xpert MTB/RIF présente un double avantage d'une part le diagnostic rapide des cas mêmes difficiles par la technique standard de l'examen direct à la microscopie et d'autre part par la détection de la résistance à la rifampicine. Notre objectif était de déterminer l'apport du test Xpert dans le diagnostic de la tuberculose toutes formes confondues. Matériels et méthode : étude transversale, descriptive à collecte rétrospective menée dans le service de Pneumophtisiologie de CHRU de Saint-Louis. Tous les cas suspects de tuberculose qui avaient bénéficié d'un test Xpert de 2018 à 2020avec un dossier médical accessible et exploitable ont été inclus. Les paramètres étudiés étaient les données sociodémographiques, cliniques et biologiques. Résultats : Nous avions colligés 524dossiers de malades avec un sex-ratio de 1,3. L'âge moyen des patients était de 37 ans+/-15 ans. Il y'avait 285 prélèvements positifs au GeneXpert dont 224 d'origine pulmonaire et 61d'origine extra pulmonaire. Le nombre d'échantillons résistants à la rifampicine était de cinq, tous d'origine respiratoire. Conclusion: le test Xpert est une nouvelle technique moléculaire recommandée par l'OMS dans le diagnostic de la tuberculose pulmonaire. Toutefois il doit être évaluer dans le diagnostic de la tuberculose extra pulmonaire

Introduction: The Xpert MTB / RIF assay has a dual advantage on the one hand, the rapid diagnosis of even difficult cases by the standard technique of direct microscopic examination and on the other hand by the detection of resistance to rifampicin. Our objective was to determine the contribution of the Xpert test in the diagnosis of tuberculosis of all forms. Materials and method: retrospective, descriptive and analytical study carried out in the Pneumophtisiology department of the CHRU of Saint-Louis. All suspected tuberculosis cases who had received an Xpert test from 2018 to 2020 were included. The parameters studied were socio-demographic, clinical and biological data. Results: 524 patient records included in the study with a sex ratio of 1.3. The mean age of the patients was 37 +/-15 years. There were 285 positive GeneXpert samples, of which 224 were of pulmonary origin and 61 of extra-pulmonary origin. The number of rifampicin resistant samples was five, all of respiratory origin. Conclusion: the Xpert test is a new molecular technique recommended by the WHO in the diagnosis of pulmonary tuberculosis

Cost-effectiveness of Xpert®MTB/RIF in the diagnosis of tuberculosis: pragmatic study

Abstract INTRODUCTION: The intensification of research and innovation with the creation of networks of rapid and effective molecular tests as strategies for the end of tuberculosis are essential to avoid late diagnosis and for the eradication of the disease. We aimed to evaluate the cost-effectiveness of Xpert®MTB/RIF (Xpert) in the diagnosis of drug-resistant tuberculosis in reference units, in scenarios with and without subsidies, and the respective cost adjustment for today. METHODS: The analyses were performed considering as criterion of effectiveness, negative culture or clinical improvement in the sixth month of follow-up. The comparison was performed using two diagnostic strategies for the drug susceptibility test (DST), BactecTMMGITTM960 System, versus Xpert. The cost effectiveness and incremental cost-effectiveness ratio (ICER) were calculated and dollar-corrected for American inflation (US$ 1.00 = R$ 5,29). RESULTS: Subsidized Xpert had the lowest cost of US$ 33.48 (R$67,52) and the highest incremental average efficiency (13.57), thus being a dominated analysis. After the inflation was calculated, the mean cost was DST-MGIT=US$ 74.85 (R$ 396,73) and Xpert = US$ 37.33 (R$197,86) with subsidies. CONCLUSIONS: The Xpert in the diagnosis of TB-DR in these reference units was cost-effective with subsidies. In the absence of a subsidy, Xpert in TB-DR is not characterized as cost effective. This factor reveals the vulnerability of countries dependent on international organizations' subsidy policies.

Rendimiento del GeneXpert en el diagnóstico de tuberculosis pulmonar y extrapulmonar en la edad pediátrica / GeneXpert for the diagnosis of pulmonary and extrapulmonary tuberculosis in pediatric patients / GeneXpert para o diagnóstico da tuberculose pulmonar e extrapulmonar em pacientes pediátricos

resumen está disponible en el texto completo

Summary: Introduction: the World Health Organization (WHO) recommends molecular biology techniques, such as Xpert MTB/RIF, for the diagnosis of tuberculosis (TB) and for the detection of Rifampicin resistance. In Uruguay, the Xpert MTB/RIF has been used since 2014, and no research papers have yet assessed its performance. A Cochrane review recommends the assessment of the Xpert diagnostic accuracy in difficult to diagnose groups, such as, children, people living with HIV and with extrapulmonary tuberculosis. Objectives: describe cases of TB in children of under 15 years of age in Uruguay during 2018 and 2019 and describe the influence of the various diagnostic tests on the bacteriological confirmation of the disease. Evaluate the performance of the Xpert MTB/RIF for the diagnosis of TB in respiratory and non- respiratory samples using the culture as a reference standard. Compare the performance of GeneXpert with smear microscopy for TB diagnosis. Material and methods: analytical, retrospective study of children of under 15 years of age in Uruguay between January 2018 and June 2019, based on data obtained from the PNC-TB information system. Clinical-epidemiological characteristics of the TB cases were described. Definitions were taken from CHLA-EP, as per WHO recommendations. All respiratory and non-respiratory samples received by the National Reference Laboratory in Tuberculosis of the CHLA-EP from 1/1/2018 to 6/30/2019, entered in the IT system ("TB soft") were analyzed; they belonged to patients with clinical suspicion of TB, studied as contacts, or to TB risk groups (patients with immunodeficiency or at risk of immunosuppression, mainly). All samples underwent smear microscopy and/or Xpert MTB/RIF (according to the CHLA-EP protocol) and culture. The detection of Rifampicin resistance in the Xpert was compared with first- line drug sensitivity tests using molecular methods made from the cultures. The sensitivity, specificity, PPV and NPV of GeneXpert and ZN microscopy were calculated using Mycobacterium tuberculosis culture as gold standard. We calculated the Xpert positive and negative likelihood ratio (LR). Results: 67 patients under 15 years of age were diagnosed with TB, and 46% cases were bacteriologically confirmed. A total of 1670 samples were analyzed; 82% respiratory and 17% non-respiratory. A total of 32 samples showed a positive culture for M. tuberculosis (14 respiratory and 18 non- respiratory). One rifampicin resistance sample was detected in the Xpert that was not confirmed in the culture. The sensitivity of Xpert for all samples was 80%; the specificity 99,5%; PPV 80%; NPV 99,5%. In the case of smear microscopy for all samples: S 44,4%, specificity 99,4%, PPV 70,6%; NPV 98,2%. Respiratory samples: Xpert S 100%; E 99,4%; PPV 66,7%; NPV 100%. Bacilloscopy: S 72,7%; E 99,6%; PPV 72,7%; NPV 99,6%. Non-respiratory samples: Xpert S: 66,7%; E 100%; PPV 100%; NPV 97,9%. Bacilloscopy: S 25%; E 98,8%; PPV 66,7%; NPV 93,2%. The LR + of the Xpert for all samples was 160 and the LR - 0,2. Conclusions: TB in children under 15 remains difficult to diagnose. Bacteriological confirmation was attempted in 88% of TB cases, and almost 50% showed positive results by some bacteriological technique. The Xpert showed a good sensitivity and specificity profile in both respiratory and non-respiratory samples, similar to those reported in international papers. The main contribution in relation to smear microscopy is the greater sensitivity for the diagnosis of TB in children under 15 years of age. The Xpert is very useful for TB diagnosis when it is positive, although it does not ensure we can rule out the disease in case of negative results.

Resumo: Introdução: a Organização Mundial da Saúde (OMS) recomenda técnicas de biologia molecular, como o Xpert MTB / RIF para o diagnóstico de tuberculose (TB) e para a detecção de resistência à Rifampicina. No Uruguai, o Xpert MTB / RIF é usado desde 2014, e o seu desempenho ainda não tem sido avaliado. Uma revisão recente da Cochrane promove que pesquisas futuras devem avaliar a precisão diagnóstica do Xpert, em grupos difíceis de diagnosticar, como crianças, pessoas vivendo com HIV e pessoas com tuberculose extrapulmonar. Objetivos: descrever os casos de tuberculose em crianças menores de 15 anos no Uruguai nos anos 2018-2019 e a contribuição dos diferentes testes de diagnóstico na confirmação bacteriológica da doença. Avaliar o desempenho do Xpert MTB / RIF para o diagnóstico de TB em amostras respiratórias e não respiratórias de pacientes menores de 15 anos, utilizando a cultura como padrão de referência. Comparar o desempenho do GeneXpert com a baciloscopia para o diagnóstico da TB. Material e métodos: estudo analítico e retrospectivo de crianças menores de 15 anos estudadas para TB no Uruguai entre janeiro de 2018 e junho de 2019, utilizando a base em dados do sistema informático PNC-TB. Descrevemos as características clínico-epidemiológicas dos casos de TB. As definições foram retiradas do CHLA-EP de acordo com as recomendações da OMS. Todas as amostras respiratórias e não respiratórias recebidas pelo Laboratório Nacional de Referência (LNR) em Tuberculose do CHLA-EP de 01/01/2018 a 30/06/2019, inseridas no sistema computacional (TB Soft), corresponderam a pacientes com suspeita clínica de TB, estudados como contatos ou na detecção de TB em grupos de risco (pacientes com imunodeficiências ou com risco de imunossupressão, principalmente). As amostras foram realizadas por esfregaço (baciloscopia) e/ou Xpert MTB/RIF (de acordo com o protocolo CHLA-EP) e por cultura. A detecção da resistência à Rifampicina no Xpert foi comparada com os testes de sensibilidade a drogas de primeira linha (PSD), utilizando os métodos moleculares das culturas. A sensibilidade, especificidade, PPV e NPV do Xpert e esfregaço foram calculados usando a cultura como padrão de referência. Calculamos a razão de verossimilhança positiva e negativa (LR) do Xpert. Resultados: 67 crianças menores de 15 anos foram diagnosticadas com TB, e 46% dos casos foram confirmados bacteriologicamente. 1670 amostras foram analisadas; 82% respiratórias e 17% não respiratórias. 32 amostras tiveram uma cultura positiva para M. tuberculosis (14 respiratórias e 18 não respiratórias). A sensibilidade (S) do Xpert para todas as amostras foi de 80% (IC95% 37,5-96,3), especificidade (E) 99,5% (IC95% 97,3-99,9), PPV 80% (37,5-96,3), NPV 99,5% (97,3-99,9). Baciloscopia: S de 46,1% (28,7-64,5), E 99,5% (98,7-99,8), PPV 75% (50,5-89,8), VPL 98,3% (97,2-99). Amostras respiratórias: Xpert S 100%; E 99,3% VPP 66% e VPN 100%. Baciloscopia: S 66,6%, E 99,8%, PPV 80%, NPV 99,7%. Amostras não respiratórias: Xpert S: 66,6%, E 100%, PPV 100%, NPV 97,9%; Esfregaço S: 25%, E 99,3%, PPV 80%, NPV 93%. O LR + do Xpert para todas as amostras foi de 160 e o LR - 0,2. Conclusões: a TB em crianças menores de 15 anos é ainda difícil de diagnosticar. Tentamos a confirmação bacteriológica em 88% dos casos de TB, e quase 50% deles tiveram resultados positivos utilizando alguma técnica bacteriológica. O Xpert mostrou um bom perfil de sensibilidade e especificidade em amostras respiratórias e não respiratórias, semelhante ao relatado em papers internacionais. A principal contribuição em relação à baciloscopia é a maior sensibilidade para o diagnóstico de TB em menores de 15 anos. O Xpert é muito útil para o diagnóstico de TB em caso de ser positivo, embora não permita descartar a doença em casos negativos.

Serious discordance between MTBC trace positivity by Xpert MTB/RIF ultra and follow up culture

Authors wish to report a major discordance between Xpert MTB/RIF Ultra Trace positivity (GeneXpert, Cepheid) and follow up by liquid culture.

The reliability of a rapid molecular detection method in determining the prevalence of rifampicin-resistant Mycobacterium tuberculosis in an urban district health facility in Malaysia

@#Introduction: Rifampicin is a key first-line antimycobacterial agent employed for the treatment of pulmonary tuberculosis (PTB). This study sought to obtain prevalence data on rifampicin-resistant Mycobacterium tuberculosis among smear-positive PTB patients in the Klang District of Malaysia. Materials and Methods: A total of 103 patients from the Chest Clinic of Hospital Tengku Ampuan Rahimah with sputum smears positive for acid-fast bacilli were included in this cross-sectional study. All sputa were tested using Xpert MTB/RIF to confirm the presence of M. tuberculosis complex and detect rifampicin resistance. Sputa were also sent to a respiratory medicine institute for mycobacterial culture. Positive cultures were then submitted to a reference laboratory, where isolates identified as M. tuberculosis complex underwent drug susceptibility testing (DST). Results: A total of 58 (56.3%) patients were newly diagnosed and 45 (43.7%) patients were previously treated. Xpert MTB/RIF was able to detect rifampicin resistance with a sensitivity and specificity of 87.5% and 98.9%, respectively. Assuming that a single resistant result from Xpert MTB/RIF or any DST method was sufficient to denote resistance, a total of 8/103 patients had rifampicinresistant M. tuberculosis. All eight patients were previously treated for PTB (p<0.05). The overall prevalence of rifampicin resistance among smear-positive PTB patients was 7.8%, although it was 17.8% among the previously treated ones. Conclusion: The local prevalence of rifampicin-resistant M. tuberculosis was particularly high among previously treated patients. Xpert MTB/RIF can be employed in urban district health facilities not only to diagnose PTB in smear-positive patients, but also to detect rifampicin resistance with good sensitivity and specificity.

Accuracy of Xpert® MTB/RIF for the detection of tuberculosis and rifampicin-resistance tuberculosis in China: A systematic review and meta-analysis / 北京大学学报(医学版)

OBJECTIVE@#To systematically review the diagnostic accuracy of Xpert® Mycobacterium tuberculosis/rifampicin (Xpert® MTB/RIF) for the detection of active tuberculosis (TB) and rifampicin-resistance TB in Chinese patients.@*METHODS@#Four Chinese databases (SinoMed, CNKI, WanFang database, and VIP) and three English databases (PubMed, Embase, and The Cochrane Library) were searched from January 1, 2000 to September 15, 2017, to identify diagnostic tests about the accuracy of Xpert® MTB/RIF in Chinese patients. Two investigators screened the articles and extracted the information independently, and then the quality of each included study was evaluated by Quality Assessment of Diagnostic Accuracy Studies (QUADAS)-2. Bivariate random-effects meta-analysis was conducted to pool the sensitivity and specificity. In addition, subgroup analyses were performed based on patient type (TB patient and TB suspected patient), sample type (sputum, bronchoalveolar lavage fluid and others). All statistical analyses were conducted with Stata version 13.0.@*RESULTS@#A total of 47 articles were included in this systematic review. Most of them (38 articles) were in Chinese and only 9 articles were in English. All the articles were published during 2014 to 2017, and the sample size ranged from 31 to 3 151. Forty articles including 42 comparisons about TB were finally included with the pooled sensitivity of 0.94 (95%CI: 0.92, 0.95) and the pooled specificity of 0.87 (95%CI: 0.84, 0.91). Subgroup analysis showed that different patient and specimen types had no significant differences on sensitivity, but the specificity of sputum group was higher than that of bronchoalveolar lavage fluid. As for the detection of rifampicin-resistant TB, 33 articles (38 comparisons) were analyzed, the pooled sensitivity and specificity were 0.92 (95%CI: 0.89, 0.94) and 0.98 (95%CI: 0.97, 0.99) respectively. There were no significant differences between the patient and specimen in the subgroup analyses. The Deeks funnel plot showed a possible publication bias for detecting active tuberculosis (P=0.08) and no publication bias for rifampicin-resistant TB (P=0.24). The likelihood ratio scatter gram showed that in clinical applications, Xpert® MTB/RIF had a good diagnostic ability for detecting active tuberculosis, and it had good clinical diagnostic value in detecting rifampicin-resistant TB.@*CONCLUSION@#Xpert® MTB/RIF has good sensitivity and specificity in detecting TB and rifampicin-resistant TB in Chinese people. In particular, it has good clinical value in diagnosing rifampicin-resistance TB.

Microbiological diagnosis of tuberculous meningitis: Phenotype to genotype

Tuberculous meningitis (TBM) is a commonly encountered central nervous system infection. Characteristic clinical, imaging and cerebrospinal fluid parameters help clinicians to make a prompt presumptive diagnosis that enables them to start empirical anti-tuberculosis treatment. There are several close mimic to TBM, such as partially treated pyogenic meningitis, fungal meningitis, sarcoidosis, meningeal metastases and meningeal lymphomatosis. Microbiological confirmation instils a sense of confidence amongst treating physicians. With conventional phenotypic methods (cerebrospinal fluid microscopy and culture), in more than 50 per cent patients, microbiological confirmation is not achieved. Moreover, these methods take a long time before providing conclusive results. Negative result does not rule out Mycobacterium tuberculosis infection of the brain. Genotypic methods, such as IS 6110 polymerase chain reaction and automated Xpert M. tuberculosis/rifampicin (MTB/RIF) assay system improved the TBM diagnostics, as results are rapidly available. Xpert MTB/RIF assay, in addition, detects rifampicin resistance. Xpert MTB/RIF Ultra is advanced technology which has higher (60-70%) sensitivity and is being considered a game-changer in the diagnostics of TBM. A large number of TBM cases remain unconfirmed. The situation of TBM diagnostics will remain grim, if low-cost technologies are not widely available. Till then, physicians continue to rely on their clinical acumen to start empirical anti-tuberculosis treatment.

Sensitivity and Specificity of Xpert MTB/RIF for Diagnosis of Pulmonary Tuberculosis, Detection of RIF Resistance and its Concordance with Gene Sequencing for RIF Resistance

Background: Mycobacterium tuberculosis remains one of the most significant causes of death from an infectious agent. The rapid diagnosis of tuberculosis and detection of rifampicin (RIF) resistance are essential for early disease management. The diagnostic accuracy of GeneXpert need is an important issue to be considered. Objective: To determine the diagnostic accuracy of GeneXpert in the diagnosis of rifampicin resistance in pulmonary tuberculosis keeping the culture-based test as gold standard for drug sensitivity. Material and methods: A cross-sectional validation study was conducted in pulmonology department of PIMS, Islamabad. The study sample size was 352 calculated by using WHO formula. The study duration was 6 months (Oct 2015-March 2016). Non-Probability consecutive sampling was done for selection of participants. Consent forms were taken from all the participants. Results: The study found out that out of all participants 352 (100%), there were 169 (48%) females and 183 (52%) males. The mean age of participants was 29.3 ± 11.5 SD. The sensitivity of expectorated sputum was 98.5 (94.7-98.2), specificity was 50 (49.2-42.9), positive predictive value was 98 (98.5-99.9) and negative predictive value was 50 (49.3- 41.0). A statistically significant association was found between culture, age, gender, recurrence, and treatment failure (p<0.05). Conclusion: Our study highlights that Xpert MTB/RIF has high sensitivity and moderate specificity for diagnosis of pulmonary tuberculosis, high rates of detection of RIF resistance and greater concordance with gene sequencing for RIF resistance when compared with culture.

Evaluation of different laboratory methods for auxiliary diagnosis of pulmonary tuberculosis / 临床检验杂志

Objective@#To evaluate the effectiveness of different laboratory methods for the supplementary diagnosis of pulmonary tuberculosis（PTB）and provide reference data for the early diagnosis of PTB. @*Methods@#A total of 298 suspected PTB patients, who were diagnosed and treated in the outpatient department of Shanghai Tongren Hospital from January 2016 to December 2018, were divided into 3 groups: active PTB (138 cases)，inactive PTB (43 cases) and non-PTB (117 cases) group. Sputum acid-fast staining, MGIT liquid culture system and Xpert MTB/RIF test were performed to detect the sputum specimens. The sensitivity and specificity were compared by Chi-square test. @*Results@#The three methods showed certain significance for distinguishing active PTB, inactive PTB combined with non-PTB (χ 2 values were 89.08, 138.94 and 137.12 respectively, all P＜0.01). There was no significant difference for the positive rate of the three methods between inactive PTB and non-PTB. The sensitivities of acid-fast staining, MGIT liquid culture, Xpert MTB/RIF test and the combination of three methods in the diagnosis of active PTB were 45.7% (63/138), 63.8% (88/138), 65.4% (87/133) and 78.2% (104/133) respectively. The sensitivities of MGIT culture and Xpert MTB/RIF test were significantly higher than that of acid-fast staining (χ 2 was 35.79 and 11.26 respectively，all P＜0.01). There was no significant difference for the sensitivities between MGIT liquid culture and Xpert MTB/RIF test（χ 2 was 29.87, P＞0.05) . The sensitivity of combined detection was higher than that of single detection（χ 2 was 30.84, 64.62, 70.14, respectively, all P＜0.01）. The diagnostic specificities of the three methods and their combination were 99.1%（116/117), 98.3%（115/116）, 99.1%（113/114) and 97.3%（110/113）respectively. There was no significant difference for the specificities of the three methods. @*Conclusion@#High sensitivities of MGIT liquid culture and Xpert MTB/RIF test were shown in PTB diagnosis. Combined detection of the three methods may improve the sensitivity of detection.

Comparison of PCR-fluorescence probe and Xpert MTB／RIF in diagnosis of tuberculosis from non-respiratory specimens / 中华临床感染病杂志

Objective To compare the application of PCR-fluorescence probe, Bactec MGIT960 and Xpert MTB／RIF in diagnosis of tuberculosis from non-respiratory specimens.Methods Non-respiratory specimens from 225 patients with suspected tuberculosis admitted in Zhejiang Hospital of Integrated Chinese Medicine and Western Medicine from October 2017 to August 2018 were collected.There were 177 cases of tuberculosis and 48 cases of non-tuberculosis confirmed by clinical diagnosis.All specimens were tested with PCR-fluorescence probe, Xpert MTB／RIF and Bactec MGIT960.The clinical diagnostic results were used as the gold standard, and the receiver operating characteristic curve ( ROC) was drawn to evaluate the diagnostic values of three methods.The consistency of PCR-fluorescence probe method with Xpert MTB／RIF assay was analyzed.Results The sensitivity of PCR-fluorescent probe, Xpert MTB／RIF and Bactec MGIT960 in diagnosis of tuberculosis was 53.67%(95／177), 58.76%(104／177) and 31.07%(55／177), respectively.The sensitivity of PCR-fluorescent probe and Xpert MTB／RIF was higher than that of Bactec MGIT 960 culture ( χ2 ＝17.60 and 27.41, P＜0.01), while there was no significant difference between the PCR-fluorescent probe and the Xpert MTB／RIF (χ2 ＝0.93, P＞0.05).The specificity of three methods were 100.00%(48／48), 100.00%(48／48) and 97.92%(47／48), respectively (F＝1.83, P＞0.05).ROC curve analysis showed that the area under the ROC curve ( AUC) of PCR-fluorescent probe, Xpert MTB／RIF, and Bactec MGIT960 was 0.768, 0.794, and 0.645, respectively.The diagnostic value of PCR-fluorescent probe and Xpert MTB／RIF for tuberculosis was significantly higher than that of Bactec MGIT960 (Z＝5.19 and 6.52, P＜0.01); while Xpert MTB／RIF was superior to PCR-fluorescence probe (Z＝2.8, P＜0.05).In various types of specimens , there was no significant difference in the detection rate of tuberculosis between PCR-fluorescent probe method and Xpert MTB／RIF (χ2 ＝0.73, P＞0.05).The PCR-fluorescent probe and Xpert MTB／RIF had a good consistency (kappa＝0.829).Conclusion Xpert MTB／RIF is superior to PCR-fluorescence probe in the detection of tuberculosis in non-respiratory specimens such as tissues and pus, but the two have good consistency.The PCR-fluorescence probe method is economical and practical , and easy to promote, which has a high clinical application prospects.

Diagnostic accuracy of Xpert MTB/RIF assay in extrapulmonary tuberculosis

Introduction: The WHO endorsed Xpert Mycobacterium tuberculosis/rifampicin (MTB/RIF) assay, has been evaluated for pulmonary TB in a number of studies but very few have investigated it for extrapulmonary specimens. The present study evaluates the performance of Xpert MTB/RIF assay in the diagnosis of extrapulmonary TB (EPTB). Aim and Objectives: The aim of the study is to determine sensitivity and specificity of Xpert MTB/RIF assay for diagnosis of EPTB and RIF resistance in comparison to culture on Lowenstein–Jensen (LJ) medium and proportion method (PM), respectively. Materials and Methods: A total of 738 specimens from clinically suspected cases of EPTB were subjected to Ziehl–Neelsen staining, Xpert MTB/RIF assay and culture on LJ medium. PM was done on MTB isolates. Results: The sensitivity, specificity of Xpert MTB/RIF assay for diagnosis of EPTB were 84.91% (95% confidence interval [CI] 72.41%–93.25%) and 86.72% (95% CI 83.94%–89.17%) and for RIF resistance detection were 60.00% (95% CI 32.29%–83.66%) and 94.74% (95% CI 73.97%–99.87%), respectively. Among culture-positive cases, the sensitivity of Xpert MTB/RIF assay was 94.12% in smear positive and 80.56% in smear-negative cases. Xpert MTB/RIF showed maximum sensitivity of MTB detection from lymph node specimens (100% [95% CI 54.07%–100.00%]) and other body fluids (100% [95% CI 15.81%–100.00%]). Conclusion: The present study establishes Xpert MTB/RIF assay as a promising tool in the rapid diagnosis of EPTB and detection of RIF resistance.

Diagnostic value of enzyme-linked immunospot assay combined with bronchoalveolar lavage fluid tuberculous Xpert detection in smear negative pulmonary tuberculosis / 国际检验医学杂志

Objective To investigate the diagnostic value of enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay combined with bronchoalveolar lavage fluid tuberculosis Xpert detection in smear negative pulmonary tuberculosis. Methods From August 2015 to August 2016 ,68 cases of smear negative pulmonary tuberculosis ,admitted in the hospital ,were enrolled in the study.Enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay and bronchoalveolar lavage fluid tuberculosis Xpert detection were used in the study.The results of enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay and tuberculosi sXpert detection were compared with sputum culture results ,and their diagnostic values for smear negative pulmonary tuberculosis were analyzed.Results The clinical manifestations of pulmonary tuberculosis were mainly nocturnal sweating ,fever ,cough and expectoration.The results of X-ray and CT examinations showed that the lesions were mostly patchy or in cloudy opacity.The diagnostic accuracy of the combined ex-amination for different types of pulmonary tuberculosis was significantly higher than single detection of en-zyme-linked immunosorbent assay or tuberculosis Xpert detection ,and the difference was statistically signifi-cant (P＜ 0.05).The sensitivity of enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay was 88.46%,the specificity was 69.05%,and the accuracy was 76.47%;the sensitivity of tuberculosis Xpert detection was 80.77%,the speci-ficity was 52.38%,and the accuracy was 63.23%;the sensitivity of the combined detection was 92.30%,the specificity was 78.57%,and the accuracy was 83.82%;the sensitivity ,the specificity and the accuracy of the combined detection for diagnosis of smear negative pulmonary tuberculosis were significantly increased ,and the difference was statistically significant (P＜0.05).Conclusion The enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay combined with bronchoalveolar lavage fluid tuberculosis Xpert detection has important value in the diagnosis of smear negative pulmonary tuberculosis.It is a simple ,rapid and effective method of examination.

An evaluation of false-positive rifampicin resistance on the Xpert MTB/RIF

BACKGROUND Mycobacterium tuberculosis (MTB) is one of the most significant causes of mortality and morbidity. Early diagnose is important especially in multiple drug resistant tuberculosis to avoid transmission. Traditional techniques requires at least one to three weeks for diagnosis of tuberculosis. Diagnostic delays with multiple drug resistant tuberculosis are associated with worse clinical outcomes and increased transmission The Xpert MTB/RIF assay is one of the new diagnostic device for the diagnosis of tuberculosis and rapid detection of rifampicin resistance. OBJECTIVE We assessed the performance of Xpert MTB/RIF assay for detecting rifampicin resistance using phenotypic drug susceptibility tests as automated BD MGIT 960. METHODS Total of 2136 specimens were included in the study. Xpert MTB/RIF testing was performed on samples, using version 4 cartridges, according to the manufacturer's recommendations. The MTBC culture and first-line phenotypic DST were performed in automated BD MGIT 960 (Becton & Dickinson, USA) according to the recommendations of the manufacturer. Agar proportion was used in the case of inconsistency for rifampicin resistance. FINDINGS Thirty-four samples (19 respiratory and 15 nonrespiratory samples) were determined as positive for M. tuberculosis complex by Xpert MTB/RIF (Cepheid GeneXpert® System, USA). Xpert MTB/RIF assay detected 4/34 (11.7%) specimens as rifampicin resistant. One of the rifampicin resistant isolates was determined susceptible in MGIT 960 automated system. This isolate was also tested with agar proportion method and found susceptible to rifampicin. MAIN CONCLUSION The Xpert MTB/RIF assay can be used as first-line assay for the detection of M. tuberculosis. However, microbiologists must be aware of the limitations of the assay.

Evaluación de la técnica Xpert® MTB/RIF para la detección de Mycobacterium tuberculosis complex en muestras extra-pulmonares / Evaluation of Xpert® MTB/RIF technique for Mycobacterium tuberculosis complex detection in extra-respiratory specimens

Resumen La tuberculosis (TBC) extra-pulmonar alcanza al 26,2% de los casos totales de TBC en Chile. El cultivo es el método estándar de oro, pero es lento. La técnica Xpert® MTB/RIF permite detectar Mycobacterium tuberculosis complex (MTBc) por RPC en tiempo real en menos de 3 h, sin embargo, ha sido validada sólo para muestras respiratorias. El objetivo de este estudio fue determinar la utilidad de la prueba Xpert® MTB/RIF en la detección de MTBc en muestras extra-pulmonares en comparación con un estándar de oro combinado consistente en un cultivo de micobacterias positivo (medio sólido y líquido) y/o un método molecular validado positivo (q-RPC, Cobas® TaqMan-MTB). Se analizaron 50 muestras extra-pulmonares, de las cuales 25 fueron definidas positivas y 25 negativas para MTBc en base a estándar de oro combinado. Las 25 muestras definidas positivas tuvieron un resultado positivo por Xpert® MTB/RIF; de las 25 muestras definidas negativas, 24 tuvieron un resultado negativo y una de ellas un resultado positivo. Se obtuvo una concordancia global entre Xpert® MTB/RIF y el estándar de oro combinado de 98%. La prueba Xpert® MTB/RIF fue capaz de detectar 12 casos de TBC extra-pulmonar con baciloscopia negativa y 3 casos con cultivo negativo. El método Xpert® MTB/RIF ha demostrado tener una sensibilidad similar al q-RPC para detectar MTBc en muestras extra-pulmonares y permite reducir sustancialmente el tiempo de diagnóstico.

Extra-pulmonary tuberculosis (TB) represents the 26.2% of total TB cases in Chile. Culture is the gold standard method, but the process is extremely slow. Xpert®MTB/RIF technique detects Mycobacterium tuberculosis complex (MTBc) through real time PCR in less than 3 h. However, it has been validated only for respiratory specimens. We aimed to determine the performance of Xpert®MTB/RIF test in detecting MTBc in extra-respiratory specimens compared with a combined gold standard consisting in a positive (liquid and solid) mycobacterial culture and/or a positive validated molecular method (q-RPC, Cobas®TaqMan®-MTB). Fifty extra-respiratory specimens were analyzed, from which 25 were positive and 25 negative for MTBc based on the combined gold standard. The 25 positive specimens had a positive result by Xpert®MTB/RIF; from the 25 negative specimens, 24 had a negative result and one had a positive result. We obtained an overall concordance of 98% between Xpert®MTB/RIF and the combined gold standard. Xpert®MTB/RIF test was able to detect 12 smear-negative specimens and 3 culture-negative specimens, all of them corresponding to extra-pulmonary TB cases. Xpert®MTB/RIF showed similar sensitivity to q-RPC in detecting MTBc in extra-respiratory specimens. This procedure allowed a substantial reduction in the time of diagnosis.

Application value of Xpert MTB/RIF in diagnosis of spinal tuberculosis and detection of rifampin resistance / 中国骨伤

<p><b>OBJECTIVE</b>To investigate the application value of Xpert MTB/RIF in diagnosis of spinal tuberculosis and detection of rifampin resistance.</p><p><b>METHODS</b>The 109 pus specimens were obtained from patients who were primaryly diagnosed as spinal tuberculosis. All of the pus specimens were detected by acid-fast stain, liquid fast culturing by BACTEC MGIT 960 and Xpert MTB/RIF assay to definite the differences in sensitivity and specificity of mycobacterium tuberculosis among detecting methods. Pus specimens obtained by different methods were deteceded by MTB/RIF test to analyze the self-influence on Xpert MTB/RIF test. The result of liquid fast culturing by BACTEC MGIT 960 was used as the gold standard; and the value of Xpert MTB/RIF assay in detecting rifampin resistance was analyzed.</p><p><b>RESULTS</b>The sensitivity of acid-fast stain, liquid fast culturing by BACTEC MGIT 960 and Xpert MTB/RIF assay were 25.92%, 48.15%, 77.78%, respectively. The sensitivity of pus specimens obtained from open surgery, ultrasound positioning puncture and biopsy the sensitivity were 83.78%, 76.47%, 44.68% respectively deteceded by MTB/RIF test. According to the gold standard of the results of liquid fast culturing by BACTEC MGIT 960 assay, the sensitivity and specificity of Xpert MTB/RIF assay in detecting rifampin resistance were 80%(4/5) and 90.70%(39/43), respectively.</p><p><b>CONCLUSIONS</b>Xpert MTB/RIF assay has higher value in diagnosis of spinal tuberculosi, and also can detect rifampin resistance. The number of mycobacterium tuberculosis in pus specimens has a great influence in the sensitivity of Xpert MTB/RIF assay.</p>

Evaluation of Xpert MTB/RIF assay performance in the diagnosis of abdominal tuberculosis

BACKGROUND/AIMS: The use of genetic probes for the diagnosis of pulmonary tuberculosis (TB) has been well described. However, the role of these assays in the diagnosis of intestinal tuberculosis is unclear. We therefore assessed the diagnostic utility of the Xpert Mycobacterium tuberculosis/rifampicin (MTB/RIF) assay, and estimated the prevalence of multidrug-resistant (MDR) TB in the Indian population. METHODS: Of 99 patients recruited, 37 had intestinal TB; two control groups comprised 43 with Crohn's disease (CD) and 19 with irritable bowel syndrome. Colonoscopy was performed before starting any therapy; mucosal biopsies were subjected to histopathology, acid-fast bacilli staining, Lowenstein-Jensen culture, and nucleic acid amplification testing using the Xpert MTB/RIF assay. Patients were followed up for 6 months to confirm the diagnosis and response to therapy. A composite reference standard was used for diagnosis of TB and assessment of the diagnostic utility of the Xpert MTB/RIF assay. RESULTS: Of 37 intestinal TB patients, the Xpert MTB/RIF assay was positive in three of 37 (8.1%), but none had MDR-TB. The sensitivity, specificity, positive predictive value, and negative predictive value of the Xpert MTB/RIF assay was 8.1%, 100%, 100%, and, 64.2%, respectively. CONCLUSIONS: The Xpert MTB/RIF assay has low sensitivity but high specificity for intestinal TB, and may be helpful in endemic tuberculosis areas, when clinicians are faced with difficulty differentiating TB and CD. Based on the Xpert MTB/RIF assay, the prevalence of intestinal MDR-TB is low in the Indian population.

Value of Xpert MTB/RIF test in bronchial alveolar lavage fluid in the discovery of sputum smear negative pulmonary tuberculosis / 中国生化药物杂志

Objective To compare the detection rate of Xpert MTB/RIF test and sputum smear and culture method, and to investigate the value of the detection of the smear negative pulmonary tuberculosis.Methods 69 patients with tuberculosis diagnosed in Tianjin Haihe Hospital from July 2014 to July 2015 were examined by fiberoptic bronchoscopy ( and check of tubercle bacillus in sputum smear negative three times ) .With final diagnosis of pulmonary tuberculosis patients the number of statistical smear, culture method and Xpert MTB/RIF test their tuberculosis detection rate.Results A total of 69 patients with sputum smear negative patients with final diagnosis of 54 cases of pulmonary tuberculosis, confirmed 54 cases of tubercle bacillus in sputum smear negative pulmonary tuberculosis patients, Xpert MTB/RIF test was positive in 33 cases accounted for 61.11%(33/54).Among the 35 cases, 17 patients with Xpert MTB/RIF positive, can improve the detection rate of bacterial negative tuberculosis 31.48%(17/54), 19 cases of patients with negative smear positive, 16 cases of Xpert MTB/RIF positive, and the culture method was 84.21%(16/19).BALFXpert MTB/RIF test of tuberculosis found in 61.11%(33/54), the culture method of tuberculosis found 35.19%(19/54).The report is more than 50%, also has reached to 80%, and the selection has a great relationship.Xpert method and culture method, the difference was statistically significant (P<0.05).The positive rate of Xpert test was positive in 2 cases of positive MTB/RIF in the patients with positive smear positive 100%.Conclusion It is a simple, rapid and accurate method to do Xpert MTB/RIF test for BALF, and it can improve the smear negative tuberculosis patients found rate of 48.75%.The positive rate of the sputum smear negative is 59.62%(14+17/35+17), which is better than that of sputum smear and culture.